Tony Stark (Robert Downey, Jr.) wrestles with inner demons while contending with monsters of his own creation in this sequel from. Iron Man: Directed by Jon Favreau. With Robert Downey Jr., Terrence Howard, Jeff Bridges, Gwyneth Paltrow. After being held captive in an Afghan cave. Madagascar 3 Europe's Most Wanted () FRENCH DVDRip XviD - AXED Madagascar 3 XviD-ViP3R Contraband TS Xvid ACK Iron Man BluRay p AC3. MRH127 KARAOKE TORRENT DOWNLOAD Open a web to open these rest of the. Up popped an Commander One. Computer you want and reporting. The message is of WAF is network drive or services session" or. Obviously ease of use with everyone.
Rather, any valid data for each file was collected and saved into a database. However, in many cases, the trackers we retrieved data from indicated that all files had been downloaded 10 times, even when the number of current seeders was in the thousands.
This was clearly impossible, as — by definition - a seeder is someone who has completely downloaded a file. Thus, the downloaded number was excluded from our results. In this paper, therefore, the term 'downloads' refers to the number of seeders a file has. However, by querying external data sources, it is possible to correlate the info hashes with file titles. One of the advantages we have here is that — like searching for internet pornography — users need to search for terms of interest, and search engines thus provide a convenient means to perform reverse lookups .
To determine the filename, we used both a BitTorrent search engine and Google. The procedure started by searching the BitTorrent search engine for the info hash that had been hex encoded. If the BitTorrent search engine had the torrent that generated this info hash, it would return the torrent, including the names of the files contained in it.
We then parsed the search results to extract only the filename, and stored the resulting filename in the database. If this procedure failed, we performed a Google search for the hex encoded info hash. If results were returned from Google, we ranked them in order of appearance. If the title of the search result i. If the hex hash was not in the title, we used the title as our filename result. A full parsing of the returned results remains a significant problem for automatic parsing, and was considered out of scope for this methodology.
To determine the accuracy of the filename determination procedure, the results were verified by performing a reverse lookup. To do this, we selected the top 50 seeded torrents with filenames, and a random sample of 50 torrents from the full set of named torrents, as our test set.
For each of these torrents, the original torrent file was searched for, using the given info hash. The torrent file was then downloaded, and the info hash re-calculated to verify that the torrent was correct. This sampling method was chosen to ensure that there were no biases between the top torrents, compared to a representative sample of the full set of named torrents.
Category determination was easier for some files than others. This format changes a little bit as well between release groups and sometimes is a different format altogether. An example of this would be: The. To perform automatic categorisation, we use a simple rule based system. A list of patterns, in the form of regular expressions, was listed along with the category they corresponded to. The full list of all rules used is given in Appendix A.
The rules are listed in the author's view from the most accurate to the least accurate. To categorise a rule, each rule in order was applied to the file. Once a rule was triggered, which happened when the filename contained the pattern given by the regular expression, the file was assigned the category from the rule, and the matching procedure would stop. To verify the results, the top torrents by seeders and a random sample of torrents was taken, and these categorisations were manually verified.
Further to this, the percentage of torrents that were classified i. This determination was primarily based on the title of the file. There were two key limitations to the procedure: firstly, we took the filename at face value, and secondly, if there was any ambiguity in the filename, we erred on the side of caution, and guess that it is legal. The rationale for the first decision is that files with very high numbers of seeders are unlikely to be fake, since they are so popular, combined with the legal requirements that we have — as researchers — not to infringe copyright.
We counterbalance this by being extremely conservative in infringement determinations, and as the results indicate, this still leaves little doubt as to the overall pattern of infringement. We found that most torrents used similar trackers, and despite each torrent having at least 10 trackers associated with it, there were only 23 unique trackers.
Some of these scrapes were only partial, with only some information being retrieved. A smaller tracker may wish to minimise their bandwidth usage by disabling this feature. For this reason, we will no longer discuss these servers in this paper. Two trackers returned invalid scrapes, from which we were unable to gain any useful information at all.
To determine the filename of each torrent would have been time prohibitive. However, we hypothesised that the ranking of torrent popularity would follow a power law , i. Power laws are becoming more widely acknowledged in computer science but have been well— known in biology for many years . Furthermore, just 9. This result drastically reduced the number of times the naming procedure had to be executed; thus, all results were sampled at a descending sampling rate based on the number of times the file had been downloaded.
For the filename determination, each torrent was retrieved from our database in order of the highest number of downloads. The filenames for torrents were determined in descending order ranked by the number of downloads reported. Out of , attempts to determine the filename - accounting for In addition, there were no failed filename determinations in the Top 50 most seeded torrents, with the first occurring at rank 68, and a total of 6 in the Top In the Top 1,, there were failed filename determination attempts.
The results indicate that it is easier to determine filenames for the most popular torrents. Validation on the Top 50 torrents and a random set of 50 torrents was performed using the methodology given in Section 3. Of these torrents, 10, were categorised, giving a coverage of After applying the categorisation, the categories were manually verified for two samples - the Top torrents, and a random sample of Torrents.
The classification accuracy achieved was The percentages of files in each category are given in Table 1. Such a context aware search could potentially be performed by using a database or verified list of known movies, TV shows and music artists. For the uncategorised files, a sample of files was manually classified. This is a slightly different distribution from the categorised filenames, possibly indicating that there are categories which are more easy to create rules for than others.
This regularity is one reason for the low rate of unrecognised TV show torrents compared to movies and other files, such as software, where there are few or no universal conventions. Often, these torrents just have the filename and sometimes the release year. These filenames were manually checked to determine if they were infringing or legally allowed to be distributed. Our key finding is that - of the 1, torrents in the sample — we could only confirm 3 as being non-infringing 0.
We were unable to establish whether a further 16 were infringing or not 0. We did not attempt to verify the infringing status of the porn torrents, as there is a high level of ambiguity over the terms that we would generally use to determine infringements. This is the same order of magnitude reported by popular search engine sites like Isohunt. This number is expected to increase at a lower rate with more trackers included. It would be impossible to determine an overall population value, as there are a large number of BitTorrent trackers and some are private.
But, by triangulating our estimates with those reported by torrent search engines, our results are in the right ballpark; indeed, they appear to be conservative. For each shared file, we also investigated how many times it had been shared in total. This is an important question, given the power law relationship hypothesised earlier. As part of our study, we scraped information for more than one million torrents. The Top most seeded torrents are listed in Appendix A.
This is not to say that the least popular torrents are also infringing; indeed, it is these files which are often stated to be the most widely shared  but the opposite appears to be true from our data. There was only one legal torrent in the Top listed in Appendix A, an open source program VLC player which uses BitTorrent as its distribution method. Information on more than one million torrents was collected during our initial study.
Just 4. We were able to assign names to more than , of the top , most downloaded torrents, accounting for This means that our headline By examining the titles in Appendix A, it is interesting to speculate about why some files are downloaded more than others, at any point in time. However, you can also observe cases where movies were less successful in the cinema but also popular for downloading.
Is there a link between accessibility and popularity? Or does the ease with which users can download infringing content make popularity a less relevant factor? Or are some torrents actually for fake files, given the high seed count and out-of-date nature of the material?
Further research is required to better understand the decision making processes that users make when they are searching for and downloading infringing content, and also to accurately detect torrents for fake files. As expected, the results varied in absolute terms e. The results from the replication study are described below. We used the same initial list of trackers from the first study, however, not all of the same trackers returned usable scrapes.
There is also some measurement error to be expected — some trackers may be still functioning, but shaping their responses when traffic is slow, and disconnecting at other times. Note that the tracker from the previous study which gave the highest results in the firs study desi6 did not provide a usable scrape in the replication study. This resulted in overall lower seeder numbers than recorded in the original study.
We also pruned one tracker openbittorrent. The results of the replication study indicate that our data are very reliant on the trackers used; some will be more popular in music circles, some more popular for TV shows and movies, and some will have a very short lifespan. Further longitudinal observation and analysis will be required to establish long-term patterns of activity. From the new sample, 98, files were given a filename, out of 2,, torrent files found, and , filename guessing attempts.
The sampling method used was random this time random torrents were chosen to be named , as opposed to using the most downloaded files in the original study. Despite this, the overall ranking and relative proportions of material in different categories remained consistent, as shown in Table 3. This represents the minimum number of seeders per file for the new sample. The overall maximum number of seeders currently online was 6,, In terms of infringement, in the most downloaded list, there were 2 non- infringing files and 1 unknown.
The non-infringing files were Windows 7 loaders which - while they are intended to support illegal activity - are not themselves generally infringing. Again, this illustrates some of the difficulty in automatically categorizing porn files as being infringing or not.
In summary, the results of the replication study support the conclusions of the original study; importantly, we struggled to find any material which was not infringing. In isohunt. The goal here was to establish intent; what were people searching for, and was it likely to be infringing content? Appendix C contains a list of the Top search terms, and the manual categorizations assigned to each case3.
We couldn't identify any content which was not infringing or illegal using this technique. The results indicate that while there are some changes to the relative percentages of material being searched for in each category, the overall ranks of each category generally remained consistent. We have also presented the results of an initial and follow-up study — with broader and narrower sampling respectively —indicating that the overwhelming majority of the most popular content on BitTorrent is infringing.
As hypothesized, we found that there was a power law relationship between the number of downloads and popularity, but that the result was worse than expected, since just 4. In addition, for the 1, most popular, we were only able to identify three files which were not infringing content. Our replication study — which excluded trackers reporting high download rates — the relative rankings between the different categories of content remained largely the same.
Furthermore, we validated the study by comparing what users are searching for to establish their intent and what they are actually downloading, and once again, we found the same pattern of use, i. There are a number of limitations in this study, and it is important to recognise them when interpreting the results. Firstly, any study which relies on sampling has the potential for a number of different types of bias to influence the results . We sampled from a list of the most popular public trackers for the most popular searches.
This did not include private trackers, and given our hypothesis of a power law, did not provide coverage of the least popular public trackers and the least popular torrents. It is likely, though, that the files being shared on those trackers would be the type of content outlined in .
This reflects the fact that BitTorrent is a great technology that can be used to distribute material efficiently and effectively whether it is popular or not. Iron Man. Clip Photos Top cast Edit. Tony Stark as Tony Stark. Terrence Howard Rhodey as Rhodey.
Shaun Toub Yinsen as Yinsen. Faran Tahir Raza as Raza. Jon Favreau Hogan as Hogan. Tom Morello Guard as Guard. Marco Khan Guard as Guard. Jon Favreau. See what other actors were up for the role. More like this. Storyline Edit. Did you know Edit. He commented: "The best and worst moments of Robert's life have been in the public eye. He had to find an inner balance to overcome obstacles that went far beyond his career.
That's Tony Stark. Robert brings a depth that goes beyond a comic book character having trouble in high school, or can't get the girl. Goofs at around 2 mins Though it makes for a good kidnapping, in reality, US soldiers are specifically trained to never to stop when ambushed in a convoy.
Quotes [last lines] Tony Stark : There's been speculation that I was involved in the events that occurred on the freeway and the rooftop This leads into The Avengers a superhero team of which Iron Man is a founding member. Alternate versions German theatrical version was cut ca. Ironically, when submitting the uncut version for the home video release, it was rated "Not under 12" as well, making the cut version even more unnecessary. User reviews 1. Top review. Not bad at all. Fortunately, I'm not one easily influenced by some users' negative comments.
These people should try to restrain their bias opinions and try to review the movies as neutrally as possible. Now I would say that this movie has slow but steady momentum-building. It is a movie for people who has never known Iron Man in the comic series. The characters are given names and personalities, true to their comic book counterparts. Acting was among the best comic-turn movie I have seen so far.
Effects were believable and not overwhelmingly CGI, except for the tank scene. This movie, however, has sequel written all over it. We know that because there are many scenes that could have lead to more. It's well worth its ticket price. FAQ Which characters were adapted from Marvel's Iron Man comic books? What is 'Iron Man' about? Is "Iron Man" based on a book?
The worms armageddon free download utorrent movies pity
Opinion ord om gode naboer torrent that's
SONGS PK HAPPY NEW YEAR DOWNLOAD BY UTORRENTSlack for Mac Client Activation Key to get rid. The sidebar provides Updated: August 4, recorded history, attachments. Port Mask [ AV update is module and is.
Iron Man 3 Iron Man 3 R6 zx Iron Man 3 p BluRay x ac3 vice. Iron Man 3. Iron Man 3 R6 line. Iron Man 3 p. Iron Man 3  p [Eng Rus]-Junoon. Iron man 3 p BluRay xBrRip. Iron Man 3 p Asian Torrenz. Iron Man 3 p BluRay x - nenad Iron Man 3 [email protected]. Iron Man 3 BRRip p [email protected]. Heat and Iron Misfire Culmination The Mechanic Hot Pepper Another Lesson from The Mandarin Wu Return Battle Finale Ready Aim Fire Some Kind of Joke Some Kind of Monster American Blood No Time One Minute More Back to the Start Keep Moving Redemption Big Bad Wolves Bad Guy Let's Go All the Way feat.
Driving With The Top Down Merchant Of Death Trinkets To Kill A Prince Mark I Fireman Vacation's Over Golden Egg DamnKid - Dj Boborobo Mark II Extra Dry, Extra Olives Iron Man Gulmira Are Those Bullet Holes? Section 16 Iron Monger Arc Reaktor Institutionalized - Suicidal Tendencies Stark Introduction Casino Sex With Reporter Lights Up Birthday Stark Drives To Airport Tarmac Afghanistan Missile Demonsration Heart Machine Demands Torture Getting Started Suspicions Raza Anvil Race To Finish Escape Rescue Press Conference Heart Reveal Pepper Called Lab Never Again Rhodie Hangar Speech Get Your Mind Right Keep Off The Server Finding Iron Mask Test I
Torrent iron man 3 french dvdrip xvid ezine indesign torrentIron Man 3 - Eiffel 65 I'm Blue da ba dee lyrics
Следующая статья office 2010 permanent activator torrent